Are some diseases associated with a higher risk of venture capital losses?

Are some diseases associated with a higher risk of venture capital losses? 

Before summer we posted a study correlating venture capital losses in drug development with the magnitude of funding of clinical trials. We have used two approaches to find losses: 1) Companies that Pitchbook registers with a “distressed deal”, 2) Companies with M&A transaction multiples of lower than 1x; focusing on European drug development companies founded after year 2000 and with more than EUR 2M raised.  
 
Below we have studied the correlation between losses and choice of disease area.  

In the left panel we have ranked the indications according to number of losses. 

Some biotech investors, Sunstone included, are reluctant to invest in infectious diseases. The therapy payment models are not attractive and the established industry seems disinclined to buy infectious disease focused companies. The data below confirms that the field is subject to many losses and that some investors have learned the relevance of commercial viability the hard way!  
 
Oncology is the second disease category with a high loss rate, but data from our previous M&A analysis suggests that oncology ranks high in M&A frequency. In the right panel we have normalized losses relative to successes (EUR >50M M&A). Infectious diseases remain risky, while the many losses in oncology seem balanced by a higher likelihood of success – at least over the past 20 years. Cardiovascular diseases also have a high Loss to Success ratio, but numbers are low (11 losses and 1 success) and we hesitate to conclude anything.  
 
We have also analysed the average raise for the three disease areas with the highest number of losses (>20): oncology – EUR 21M per company; infectious diseases – EUR 19M per company; CNS – EUR 16M per company. Surprisingly it appears less costly to fail in CNS. Maybe CNS focused clinical trials are more definitive – whereas oncology trials are more explorative and facilitate a second try – and eventually a more costly failure?  
 
In general, we find that the diseases that seem more exposed to losses match Sunstone’s experiences – and according to the data above, an experience we apparently share with some of our industry colleagues 🙂
 
Let us know what you think!
#sunstonelifescience #lifescience #venturecapital

What do you think?
Let us know in our feed on LinkedIn:

5 latest press releases

MinvervaX CFO & CDO Appointment

MinervaX ApS, a privately held Danish biotechnology company developing a novel, prophylactic vaccine against Group B Streptococcus (GBS), today announces the appointments of Jamila Louahed as Chief Development Officer and Hans Henrik Chrois Christensen as Chief...

Treetop Meeting

We usually do not share updates from internal meetings - but this was too fantastic not to share. A full day meeting in the midst of branches of +100 year old oaks and beech trees overlooking Isefjorden in “the treetop huts” at Ryegaard & Trudsholm Godser. Spiced...

Hans T. Scambye joins Sunstone as Venture Partner

Sunstone is delighted to announce that experienced biotech executive and CEO of Galecto Hans T. Schambye will be joining our team as new Venture Partner as of 1st February 2025. With a background as an MD and PhD Hans brings to Sunstone over 25 years of experience...

Neumirna Therapeutics secures euro 20M in Series A financing

Neumirna Therapeutics (‘Neumirna’), an RNA-focused biotech company developing next-generation therapeutics for neurological disorders, is pleased to announce the first closing of its Series A funding round at €20M. The investment was co-led by new investors, Angelini...

Ascelia Pharma Successfully Meets Primary Endpoint with Strong Headline Results in Orviglance Phase 3 Study

Ascelia Pharma AB (publ) (ticker: ACE), a biotech focused on improving the life of people living with rare cancer conditions, today announced that liver imaging drug candidate, Orviglance®, significantly improved visualization of focal liver lesions, successfully...

5 latest articles

Is biotech venture capital investing more to return less?

At Sunstone we continue to track risk-adjusted return multiples (adjusted for contingent payments) versus the total capital invested in private therapeutic companies prior to M&A exits. When looking at the median trends over the past 15 years, the inflection...

An update on M&A returns for biotech venture capital

Back in in 2019 Sunstone started sharing studies of European venture capital funded successes – i.e. M&A transactions. In 2021 we started adding US M&A’s to the data and later the same year we evaluated to which extent an IPO impacted the observations made....

Biotech ecosystem contributors!

Biotech ecosystem contributors! In our previous post, we discussed the importance of local investors and how, in a Danish context, they contribute to identifying and scaling local and regional therapeutic innovation. However, not all investors are born equal - and an...

Do local investors make a difference?

Do local investors make a difference? E-mail outreach, online meetings and digital data rooms have become a given when trying to finance a therapeutic innovation! So, do local or regional anchor investors matter when developing a bioinnovation ecosystem? If the local...

Seed & Series A in Denmark

Financing a Danish Biotech company has apparently never been more challenging. Based on feedback from partnering meetings in 2025 it seems that raising Series A financing has become an unprecedented challenge. However, when looking at the available data on the...

The 10 Advisements

We have the utmost respect for the courage, dedication, and resilience it takes to be an entrepreneur in our industry - especially when you’re out raising your next round of financing. That’s why we’ve decided to share our “10 Advisements” for crafting a compelling...